Performance of the ambient tax: does the nature of the damage matter?
Nasreddine Ammar,
Ahmed Ennasri () and
Marc Willinger
Working Papers from LAMETA, Universtiy of Montpellier
Abstract:
The ambient tax is often considered as an effcient instrument to achieve a rst best outcome of ambient pollution when the regulator is less informed than the polluters. Since the ambient tax was never imple- mented in the eld, empirical evidence is missing. Available experimental ndings provide mixed evidence: effciency is higher under external dam- age, i.e. if ambient pollution affects non-polluters (Spraggon, 2002, 2003) than under internal damage, i.e. if ambient pollution a¤ects polluters themselves (Cochard et al., 2005). Since these two types of experiments relied on very different designs, it is worthwhile to compare them under a common experimental design. Our main nding is that the ambient tax is equally effcient under external damage than under internal damage.
Pages: 27 pages
Date: 2011-12, Revised 2011-12
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-env and nep-exp
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.lameta.univ-montp1.fr/Documents/DR2011-25.pdf First version, 2011 (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 500 Can't connect to www.lameta.univ-montp1.fr:80 (No such host is known. )
Related works:
Journal Article: Performance of the Ambient Tax: Does the Nature of the Damage Matter? (2014) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:lam:wpaper:11-25
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from LAMETA, Universtiy of Montpellier Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Patricia Modat ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).