Managing interacting species in unassessed fisheries
Nicolas Querou and
Agnes Tomini
Working Papers from LAMETA, Universtiy of Montpellier
Abstract:
This paper addresses the management of multispecies sheries, and suggests the use of restricted shing policies as an interesting option for unassessed sheries (as is the case within developing countries). Specically, we consider a predator-prey system where agents compete to harvest from two interacting sh species. Two management policies are considered: an unrestricted regime where agents can harvest from both species, and a second one where only the predators can be harvested. The performance of both policies is compared from an ecological and an economic point of view. For a suciently large number of agents (or for strong biological interaction parameters) the restricted shing policy is shown to yield both higher long run stock levels and prots. Thus, this contribution suggests that such a policy would require very little monitoring while meeting environmental and economic objectives.
Pages: 22 pages
Date: 2012-10, Revised 2012-10
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-env
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.lameta.univ-montp1.fr/Documents/DR2012-32.pdf First version, 2012 (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 500 Can't connect to www.lameta.univ-montp1.fr:80 (No such host is known. )
Related works:
Journal Article: Managing interacting species in unassessed fisheries (2013) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:lam:wpaper:12-32
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from LAMETA, Universtiy of Montpellier Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Patricia Modat ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).