An Experiment on subjective Game Valuations

Aurora García-Gallego, Nikolaos Georgantzís (), Maria Gil Molto and Vicente Orts ()
Additional contact information
Vicente Orts: IEI, LEE and Dpt Economics, Universitat Jaume I

Discussion Paper Series from Department of Economics, Loughborough University

Abstract: We experimentally test the hypothesis that players' valuations of a game coincide with their Nash equilibrium earnings. Our results offer significantly less support for this hypothesis than for the prediction of dominant strategy play.

Keywords: Game Value; Subgame Perfection; Dominant Strategies; Behavioral Game Theory (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C72 C91 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2006-04, Revised 2006-04
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe, nep-exp and nep-gth
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.lboro.ac.uk/departments/ec/RePEc/lbo/lb ... luations2006wps4.pdf
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (http://www.lboro.ac.uk/departments/ec/RePEc/lbo/lbowps/subjectivevaluations2006wps4.pdf [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.lboro.ac.uk/departments/ec/RePEc/lbo/lbowps/subjectivevaluations2006wps4.pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: An experiment on subjective game valuations (2006)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:lbo:lbowps:2006_4

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Discussion Paper Series from Department of Economics, Loughborough University Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Huw Edwards ().