The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness?

Stefan Ambec, Mark Cohen, Stewart Elgie and Paul Lanoie

No 10.14.320, LERNA Working Papers from LERNA, University of Toulouse

Date: 2010-09
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cse, nep-env, nep-his, nep-ino and nep-reg
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (38)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www2.toulouse.inra.fr/lerna/travaux/cahiers2010/10.14.320.pdf Full text (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 500 Can't connect to www2.toulouse.inra.fr:80 (A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or established connection failed because connected host has failed to respond.)

Related works:
Journal Article: The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness? (2013)
Working Paper: The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness? (2011)
Working Paper: The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness? (2010)
Working Paper: The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness? (2010)
Working Paper: The Porter Hypothesis at 20: can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness? (2010)
Working Paper: The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness? (2010)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ler:wpaper:10.14.320

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in LERNA Working Papers from LERNA, University of Toulouse Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Maxime MARTY ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).