Gerontocracy revisited: Unilateral transfer to the young may benefit the middle-aged

Panu Poutvaara

Munich Reprints in Economics from University of Munich, Department of Economics

Abstract: According to conventional wisdom, intergenerational transfers can survive, in the absence of altruism, only if the old are net recipients. I prove that this need not hold in an overlapping generations model with a fixed factor. For example, the middle-aged owning land may gain by providing public education even when they cannot tax the young and when the young face no credit market constraints. This requires that labor is not mobile. Furthermore, establishing public education may benefit only the generation which pays for education twice, first for itself and then for the next generation.

Date: 2004
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Published in Journal of Public Economics 1-2 88(2004): pp. 161-174

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Journal Article: Gerontocracy revisited: unilateral transfer to the young may benefit the middle-aged (2004)
Working Paper: Gerontocracy Revisited: Unilateral Transfer to the Young May Benefit the Middle-aged (2002)
Working Paper: Gerontocracy Revisited. Unilateral Transfer to the Young May Benefit the Middle-Aged (2001)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:lmu:muenar:19295

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Munich Reprints in Economics from University of Munich, Department of Economics Ludwigstr. 28, 80539 Munich, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tamilla Benkelberg ().