EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The Pros and Cons of North American Monetary Integration

Sven Arndt ()
Additional contact information
Sven Arndt: Lowe Institute of Political Economy, Claremont McKenna College

No 202, Working Papers from Lowe Institute of Political Economy

Abstract: This study examines the major arguments for and against enhanced monetary integration in North America, with particular emphasis on the Canadian perspective. In this context, the question is whether the current floating rate regime should be replaced by greater fixity of exchange rates in relation to the U.S. dollar. While the choice among fixed rate systems is wide in priciple, for practical purposes the Canadian debate centres on the pros and cons of monetary union. Although much of the debate focuses on traditional concerns of macroeconomic stability and policy management, some observers suspect that the floating rate system has retarded the development of high tech manufacturing. The study reviews the core arguments for and against fixed rates and currency union; examines problems associated with nominal rigidities; and assesses the role of exchange rate regimes in the evolution of economic structure. It considers trade-offs among alternative exchange rate regimes, and takes up the political dimension of closer monetary cooperation.

Keywords: monetary union; regional integration; NAFTA (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 38 pages
Date: 2002
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://lowe.claremontmckenna.edu/pdf/WP02-02.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:loi:wpaper:0202

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Lowe Institute of Political Economy Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Alex Huemer ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).

 
Page updated 2025-03-30
Handle: RePEc:loi:wpaper:0202