Adjudication: Type-I and Type-II Errors
No wpC15, CERBE Working Papers from CERBE Center for Relationship Banking and Economics
Adjudicative procedures meant at establishing truth about facts on defendants’ behavior are naturally prone to errors: defendants can be found guilty/liable when they truly were not (type-I errors) or they can be acquitted when they should have been convicted (type-II errors). These errors alter the incentives of defendants to comply with norms. We review the literature with a particular focus on type-I errors.
Keywords: type-I errors, wrongful convictions; justice concerns, burden of proof, deterrence; law enforcement (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: K4 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 14 pages
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-law
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:lsa:wpaper:wpc15
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in CERBE Working Papers from CERBE Center for Relationship Banking and Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Pierluigi Murro ().