Persistence of Fortune: Accounting for Population Movements, There was No Post-Columbian Reversal

Areendam Chanda, Justin Cook () and Louis Putterman

Departmental Working Papers from Department of Economics, Louisiana State University

Abstract: We revisit the idea that colonized countries that were more (less) economically advanced in 1500 became poorer (richer, respectively) by the late 20th century. Using data on place of origin of today�s country populations and the urbanization and population density measures used by Acemoglu et al. (2002) as indicators of level of development in 1500, we confirm a reversal of fortune for territories but find persistence of fortune for people and their descendants. The results are equally strong or stronger for three alternative measures of early development, namely years since transition to agriculture, state history, and the Comin et al. (2010) year 1500 technology index. They are also robust to changing end years, to inclusion of non-colonized countries or exclusion of �neo-Europes� and city states, and to the addition of various controls.

Date: 2013-03
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.lsu.edu/business/economics/files/workingpapers/pap13_03.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Persistence of Fortune: Accounting for Population Movements, There Was No Post-Columbian Reversal (2014)
Working Paper: Persistence of fortune: Accounting for Population Movements, There was no Post-Columbian Reversal (2013)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:lsu:lsuwpp:2013-03

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Departmental Working Papers from Department of Economics, Louisiana State University Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().