Not-So-Strong Evidence for Gender Differences in Risk Taking

Julie Nelson

No 2013_06, Working Papers from University of Massachusetts Boston, Economics Department

Abstract: In their article "Strong Evidence for Gender Differences in Risk Taking," Gary Charness and Uri Gneezy (2012) review a number of experimental studies regarding investments in risky assets, and claim that these yield strong evidence that females are more risk averse than males. This study replicates and extends their article, demonstrating that its claims and methods are highly problematic. While Charness and Gneezy assert that differences exist at the individual level, the data indicate only that modest differences (at most) exist at aggregate levels, such as group means. The evidence in favor of gender differences is thus considerably less strong than claimed. This analysis has important implications both at the design of behavioral and economic research and for policies related to discrimination and stereotyping.

Keywords: risk aversion; gender; risk; stereotyping; effect size (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: B41 C12 D03 D81 J16 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 41 pages
Date: 2013-12
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
http://repec.umb.edu/RePEc/files/2013_06.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mab:wpaper:2013_06

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from University of Massachusetts Boston, Economics Department Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Harry Konstantinidis ().