 On the plausibility of adaptive learning in macroeconomics: A puzzling conflict in the choice of the representative algorithmMichele Berardi and Jaqueson Galimberti Centre for Growth and Business Cycle Research Discussion Paper Series from Economics, The University of Manchester Abstract: The literature on bounded rationality and learning in macroeconomics has often used recursive algorithms such as least squares and stochastic gradient to depict the evolution of agents' beliefs over time. In this work, we try to assess the plausibility of such practice from an empirical perspective, by comparing forecasts obtained from these algorithms with survey data. In particular, we show that the relative performance of the two algorithms in terms of forecast errors depends on the variable being forecasted, and we argue that rational agents would therefore use different algorithms when forecasting different variables. By using survey data, then, we show that agents instead always behave as least squares learners, irrespective of the variable being forecasted. We thus conclude that such findings point to a puzzling conflict between rational and actual behaviour when it comes to expectations formation. Pages: 29 pages Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:man:cgbcrp:177 Access Statistics for this paper More papers in Centre for Growth and Business Cycle Research Discussion Paper Series from Economics, The University of Manchester Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.