EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Helping the Working Poor: Employer- vs. Employee-Based Subsidies

Stacy Dickert-Conlin () and Douglas Holtz-Eakin

No 14, Center for Policy Research Policy Briefs from Center for Policy Research, Maxwell School, Syracuse University

Abstract: In the United States and Europe there has been renewed interest in subsidizing firms that employ disadvantaged workers as a means of addressing poverty and other social problems. In contrast, the prevailing practice is largely to provide social welfare benefits directly to individuals. Which approach is better? We re-examine the relative merits of employee- versus employer-based labor market subsidies and conclude there are good reasons to continue to rely on the direct, employee-based approach. In practice, low-wage workers are seldom either low-skill or low-income workers. Furthermore, workers who might quality for a firm-based subsidy are reluctant to so identify themselves for fear of being stigmatized or labeled as "needy." Thus, employer-based subsidy programs have lower participation rates and correspondingly higher per capita expenditures than employee-based subsidy programs.

JEL-codes: I38 J31 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 32 pages
Date: 1999-08
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.maxwell.syr.edu/uploadedFiles/cpr/publ ... licy_briefs/pb14.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:max:cprpbr:14

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Center for Policy Research Policy Briefs from Center for Policy Research, Maxwell School, Syracuse University 426 Eggers Hall, Syracuse, New York USA 13244-1020. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Margaret Austin () and Candi Patterson () and Katrina Wingle ().

 
Page updated 2021-05-19
Handle: RePEc:max:cprpbr:14