Charge-offs, Defaults and the Financial Accelerator
Christopher Gunn (),
Alok Johri () and
Department of Economics Working Papers from McMaster University
We uncover new facts: U.S. banks countercyclically vary the ratio of charge-offs to defaulted loans (COD). The variance of this ratio is roughly 15 times larger than that of GDP. Canonical financial accelerator models cannot explain this variance. We develop an expression for the wedge between charge-offs and defaults in the model and show that introducing stochastic default costs as in Gunn and Johri (2013a) and stochastic risk as in Christiano et al. (2014) into the canonical theoretical model can potentially resolve the discrepancy since both shocks have the ability to move this wedge. Estimating the augmented model using Bayesian techniques reveals that default cost shocks account for most of the variance of COD, while risk shocks account for most of the credit spread. Both shocks also matter for standard U.S. business cycle variables, with the anticipated components of each being most important.
Keywords: Charge-offs and defaults; default cost shocks; news shocks; risk shocks; financial accelerator models; business cycles (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E3 E44 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 57 pages
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ban, nep-dge, nep-mac and nep-ore
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mcm:deptwp:2020-17
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Department of Economics Working Papers from McMaster University Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().