Individual Decision Making in Exogenous Targeting Instrument Experiments
John Spraggon ()
McMaster Experimental Economics Laboratory Publications from McMaster University
The experimental treatments analysed in this paper are simple in that there is a unique Nash equilibrium resulting in each player having a dominant strategy. However, the data show quite clearly that subjects do not always choose this strategy. In fact, when this dominant strategy is not a “focal” outcome it does not even describe the average decision adequately. It is shown that average individual decisions are best described by a decision error model based on a censored distribution as opposed to the truncate regression model which is typically used in similar studies. Moreover it is shown that in the treatments where the dominant strategy is not “focal” dynamics are important with average subject decisions initially corresponding to the “focal” outcome and then adjusting towards the Nash prediction. Overall, 66.7% of subjects are consistent with Payoff Maximization, 27.8% are consistent with an alternate preference maximization and 5.6% are random.
JEL-codes: C72 C29 D70 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 26 pages
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (http://socserv.socsci.mcmaster.ca/~mceel/papers/mhgiii.pdf [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://socialsciences.mcmaster.ca/~mceel/papers/mhgiii.pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mcm:mceelp:2002-01
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in McMaster Experimental Economics Laboratory Publications from McMaster University Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().