Should we Bet on Private or Public Water Utilities in Cambodia? Evidence on Incentives and Performace from Seven Provincial Towns

Mike Garn, Jonathan Isham () and Satu Kahkonen

Middlebury College Working Paper Series from Middlebury College, Department of Economics

Abstract: Is public or private sector provision of water more likely to succeed in urban areas of Cambodia? Using quantitative and qualitative data from a range of surveys and technical assessments, this paper compares consumer satisfaction and technical performance of four private and four public utilities in Cambodia. The results indicate that households served by private utilities are significantly more satisfied with the piped water than customers of public utilities: the daily availability and quality of piped water is better and service interruptions are less frequent. This has not happened by accident. Private utilities hire more educated staff whom they pay higher salaries; maintain their facilities on a more regular basis; and implement quality control programs more diligently. Private sector operators seem to face stronger incentives than public utilities to keep their customers satisfied. However, this improved service does not come for free and, consequently, does not yet reach all the available households. Households served by private utilities pay significantly more for piped water services, and some lower-income households that are not served by private utilities are partially limited by the high connection fees (as opposed to the regular monthly payments). Overall, while this recent effort to introduce private sector involvement in the water sector in Cambodia is encouraging, the full gains have not yet been realized. The commercial incentive for improved performace will likely be stronger if the privatization option used is a lease or concession arrangement; if there is more competition in the water market; and if the regulatory structure in Cambodia encourages commercial incentives to be more demand-responsive and cost conscious. Under these conditions, the private sector is a good bet.

Keywords: supply; privatization; urban infrastructure; Cambodia (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O17 Q31 R51 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 36 pages
Date: 2002-06
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-mic and nep-reg
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.middlebury.edu/services/econ/repec/mdl/ancoec/0219.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mdl:mdlpap:0219

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Middlebury College Working Paper Series from Middlebury College, Department of Economics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Vijaya Wunnava ().