Sovereign Defaults and Trade: External vs. Domestic Creditors

Dennis Essers, Silvia Marchesi and Nejat G. Okatan

No 575, Working Papers from University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Economics

Abstract: This paper shows that the trade costs of sovereign default depend on the identity of defaulted creditors. Comparing external and domestic defaults on privately held debt across 128 developing countries over 1980–2019, and applying both two-way fixed effects and stacked difference-in-differences estimators,we find that external defaults are associated with large and persistent import contractions, while domestic defaults have smaller and short-lived effects. This asymmetry is concentrated in imports of capital goods and is mirrored by declines in international lending to the private sector and in medium-to-long-term export credit insurance after external, but not domestic, defaults. By contrast, exports do not change significantly after either type of default. The results point to disruptions in cross-border trade finance as a key channel linking external defaults to trade, and highlight creditor composition as a central determinant of default-related trade costs.

Keywords: sovereign default; external debt; domestic debt; international trade; international lending; trade finance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F14 F34 G15 H63 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 67
Date: 2026-06
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://repec.dems.unimib.it/repec/pdf/mibwpaper575.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mib:wpaper:575

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Matteo Pelagatti ().