Trade and Location: A Moving Example Motivated by Japan
Alan Deardorff
No 516, Working Papers from Research Seminar in International Economics, University of Michigan
Abstract:
If trade costs matter for trade, and if distance matters for at least some trade costs, then location matters for trade. This may be especially important for Japan, given its distance from other developed countries and proximity to a number of developing countries. In this paper I explore the relationship between location and trade in a simple partial equilibrium model of a single homogeneous good that may be produced and traded by three countries located on a plane. Six equilibrium regimes arise in this model, depending on trade costs compared to differences in autarky prices. These range from complete autarky in which no country trades, through partial autarky in which only two of the three countries trade, to either of two integrated equilibria in which either two countries export to the third, or (a different) two countries import from the third. I first identify these regimes in terms of the parameter values, including trade costs, that are needed for their occurrence. I then map them on the plane where the three countries are located. Results include the following: For a country whose autarky price lies between those of the other countries, whether it will export or import the good depends on its proximity to the other countries. It will export the good if it is close to the high-cost country, import it if it is close to the low-cost country, and not trade it at all if it is too far from both. The location of such a country is also important for the trade of the other countries. For example, the lowest cost country may not be able to trade at all if the intermediate-cost country, by virtue of its location, takes away the market of the high-cost country. Finally, although a fall in trade costs increases, up to a point, the geographic scope for a country to trade, beyond that point it cannot make trade possible for an intermediate-cost country that is too remote to trade. I apply this model in a very stylized way to the position of Japan, noted above. It suggests that Japan, with factor endowments similar to other developed countries but located closer to many developing countries, should dominate trade with its developing-country neighbors.
Keywords: Trade Costs; Location (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F1 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 45 pages
Date: 2004
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://fordschool.umich.edu/rsie/workingpapers/Papers501-525/r516.pdf
Related works:
Journal Article: Trade and location: A moving example motivated by Japan (2005) 
Working Paper: Trade and location: A moving example motivated by Japan (2004) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mie:wpaper:516
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Research Seminar in International Economics, University of Michigan Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by FSPP Webmaster ().