Good Jobs Versus Bad Jobs: Theory and Some Evidence

Daron Acemoglu

Working papers from Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Department of Economics

Abstract: This paper offers a model of the interaction between composition of jobs and labor market regulation. Ex post rent-sharing due to search frictions implies that "good" jobs which have higher creation costs must pay higher wages. This wage differential distorts the composition of jobs, and in the unregulated equilibrium there are too many bad jobs relative to the number of good jobs.

Keywords: HUMAN CAPITAL; JOB SEEKERS; UNEMPLOYMENT; INSURANCE; WAGE DETERMINATION (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D83 J24 J31 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 50 pages
Date: 1996
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Working Paper: Good Jobs versus Bad Jobs: Theory and Some Evidence (1997)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mit:worpap:96-33

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY (MIT), DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS, 50 MEMORIAL DRIVE CAMBRIDGE MASSACHUSETTS 02142 USA

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working papers from Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Department of Economics MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY (MIT), DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS, 50 MEMORIAL DRIVE CAMBRIDGE MASSACHUSETTS 02142 USA. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Linda Woodbury ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).