Pillar I treatment of concentrations in the banking book – a multifactor approach
Zoltan Varsanyi ()
No 2006/11, MNB Working Papers from Magyar Nemzeti Bank (Central Bank of Hungary)
Abstract:
The present regulation of concentration risk does not take into consideration recent, sophisticated methods in credit risk quantification; the new Basle Capital Accord has left the regulatory treatment unchanged. Recently, substantial work has begun within the EU on this issue with the formation of the Working Group on Large Exposures within CEBS. The present paper is concerned with the models available under Basle 2 for credit risk quantification: it is searching for tools that can be applied in a new regime in general and that are capable of replicating the riskiness of credit portfolios with risk concentrations - an area that the original Basel model does not cover. The main idea of the paper is to disassemble nongranular portfolios into homogenous parts whose loss can then be directly simulated - taking into consideration the correlation between the parts - without the need to simulate single exposures. This makes the calculation of portfoliowide loss very fast.
Keywords: Basel regulation; multifactor model; NORTA; numerical integration. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C15 G28 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 41 pages
Date: 2006
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ban, nep-cfn, nep-reg and nep-rmg
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.mnb.hu/letoltes/wp2006-11.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mnb:wpaper:2006/11
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in MNB Working Papers from Magyar Nemzeti Bank (Central Bank of Hungary) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Lorant Kaszab ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).