The retrospective evaluation of payment sequences: duration neglects and peak-and-end-effects
Rakesh Sarin and
No 00-45, Papers from Sonderforschungsbreich 504
In this paper we present experimental research examining the ability of individuals to make good retrospective evaluations of payment sequences. Inspired by the evidence on systematic biases in the retrospective evaluation of affective episodes involving pain and pleasure we designed choice scenarios for payment sequences in which the existence of peak and end effects as well as duration neglect could be examined. There are two main results: We do not observe a systematic impact of payment sequence features (other than its sum) on the choices if subjects merely get delivered the payments without any affection or effort. Subjects, by and large, choose the sequence with the highest total payment. In a second scenario, in which payments were linked to the subjects? effort and performance in strenuous tasks, we observe a strong effect of duration neglect and a weaker, but still significant end effect. We further find that the mere number of peak losses in a sequence strongly influences its attractiveness. In this scenario subjects do not often choose the sequence with the highest total payment.
Keywords: retrospective evaluation; duration neglect; temporal preferences; evaluation bias (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Working Paper: The Retrospective Evaluation of Payment Sequences: Duration Neglect and Peak-and-End-Effects (2000)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mnh:spaper:2820
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Papers from Sonderforschungsbreich 504 Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Katharina Rautenberg ().