EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The Miracle of Peer Review and Development inScience: An Agent-Based Model

Simone Righi () and Karoly Takacs ()

Center for the Analysis of Public Policies (CAPP) from Universita di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Dipartimento di Economia "Marco Biagi"

Abstract: It is not easy to rationalize how peer review, as the current grassroots of science, can work based on voluntary contributions of reviewers. There is no rationale to write impartial and thorough evaluations. Consequently, there is no risk in submitting lowquality work by authors. As a result, scientists face a social dilemma: if everyone acts according to his or her own self-interest, low scientific quality is produced. Still, in practice, reviewers as well as authors invest high effort in reviews and submissions. We examine how the increased relevance of public good benefits (journal impact factor), the editorial policy of handling incoming reviews, and the acceptance decisions that take into account reputational information can help the evolution of high-quality contributions from authors. High effort from the side of reviewers is problematic even if authors cooperate: reviewers are still best off by producing low-quality reviews, which does not hinder scientific development, just adds random noise and unnecessary costs to it. We show with agent-based simulations that tacit agreements between authors that are based on reciprocity might decrease these costs, but does not result in superior scientific quality. Our study underlines why certain self-emerged current practices, such as the increased importance of journal metrics, the reputation-based selection of reviewers, and the reputation bias in acceptance work efficiently for scientific development. Our results find no answers, however, how the system of peer review with impartial and thorough evaluations could be sustainable jointly with rapid scientifi9c development.

Keywords: peer review; evolution of cooperation; reputation; agent based model. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: pages 19
Date: 2016-07
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cmp, nep-exp and nep-sog
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://155.185.68.2/campusone/web_dep/CappPaper/Capp_p144.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: The miracle of peer review and development in science: an agent-based model (2017) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mod:cappmo:0144

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Center for the Analysis of Public Policies (CAPP) from Universita di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Dipartimento di Economia "Marco Biagi" Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sara Colombini ().

 
Page updated 2021-02-21
Handle: RePEc:mod:cappmo:0144