Issues in Promoting Rural Infrastructure in India
Keshab Das ()
Additional contact information
Keshab Das: Gujarat Institute of Development Research
Documents de travail from Groupe d'Economie du Développement de l'Université Montesquieu Bordeaux IV
Abstract:
Five decades of development planning in India has been unable to ensure a decent living for a large number of people residing in rural areas. Despite many large scale rural development schemes, the absolute number of people in poverty has not declined substantially; abject poverty still remains ubiquitous in rural regions. Lack of or inadequate basic infrastructure, both social and physical, continues to remain a major constraint to progress in numerous villages and their habitations. Even during the last decade of economic reform process, started in 1991, the dismal state of rural infrastructure has hardly improved. The natural reluctance of private investors in rural infrastructure projects has been based on not only no or low returns to their capital but also uncertainties and delays involved in realising anticipated revenue from the poverty-stricken users. This shying away syndrome of private capital from rural ‘unprofitable' projects has been observed, in this paper, for such critical sectors as sanitation, drinking water, roads and housing. Whereas the role of the state remains crucial in promoting these sectors, an aspect which has been seriously neglected concerns land reforms. The significance of land as a key endowment in rural areas needs to be reconsidered as an important option, which will go a long way in creating effective demand for rural infrastructure and its efficient utilisation can be ensured at the grass root level.
JEL-codes: I38 R52 R53 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 11 pages
Date: 2001-12
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-agr
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mon:ceddtr:67
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Documents de travail from Groupe d'Economie du Développement de l'Université Montesquieu Bordeaux IV
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).