Gender Differences in Reaction to Enforcement Mechanisms: A Large-Scale Natural Field Experiment
Difang Huang and
No 08-20, Monash Economics Working Papers from Monash University, Department of Economics
We followed 58,345 borrowers from a peer-to-peer lending platform to study how females and males react to enforcement mechanisms differently. In the experiment, borrowers were randomized into treatments where they received different text messages urging for timely repayment if they had loans due the “next day”. Compared to a reminder message, the messages inducing social pressures and financial incentives reduced the overdue rate for both genders. However, females were more responsive to messages producing social pressures, while males were more responsive to financial incentives. The results imply the potential importance of a gender-dependent mechanism to enhance compliance.
Keywords: Gender differences; Natural field experiment; Enforcement mechanism (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C93 D91 J16 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 29 pages
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-exp, nep-gen and nep-hrm
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.monash.edu/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006 ... ement-Mechanisms.pdf (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mos:moswps:2020-08
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.buseco.mo ... eco/research/papers/
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Monash Economics Working Papers from Monash University, Department of Economics Department of Economics, Monash University, Victoria 3800, Australia. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Simon Angus ().