EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The differential effect of narratives prosocial behavior

Adrian Hillenbrand () and Eugenio Verrina
Additional contact information
Adrian Hillenbrand: Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods

No 2018_16, Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods from Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods

Abstract: We study how positive narratives (stories in favor of a prosocial action) and negative narratives (stories in favor of a selfish action) influence prosocial behavior. Our main findings are that positive narratives increase giving of selfish types substantially, compared to a baseline with no narratives. Negative narratives, on the other hand, have a differential effect. Prosocial types decrease their giving, while selfish types give more than in the baseline. We discuss two potential explanations for this effect: one based on the enhanced saliency of normative behavior through narratives, and another based on a social comparison argument.

New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe, nep-exp and nep-hpe
Date: 2018-12, Revised 2019-09
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.coll.mpg.de/pdf_dat/2018_16online.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mpg:wpaper:2018_16

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods from Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Marc Martin ().

 
Page updated 2019-10-10
Handle: RePEc:mpg:wpaper:2018_16