Lessons from Comparative Effectiveness Research Methods Development Projects Funded Under the Recovery Act

Jelena Zurovac and Dominick Esposito

Mathematica Policy Research Reports from Mathematica Policy Research

Abstract: The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) directed nearly US$29.2 million to comparative effectiveness research (CER) methods development.

Keywords: comparative Effectiveness Research; methods development; recovery act; research methods; research priorities (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.futuremedicine.com/doi/abs/10.2217/cer.14.64 (text/html)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (http://www.futuremedicine.com/doi/abs/10.2217/cer.14.64 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.futuremedicine.com/doi/abs/10.2217/cer.14.64 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://futuremedicine.com/doi/abs/10.2217/cer.14.64 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.fmai-hub.com/doi/abs/10.2217/cer.14.64)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mpr:mprres:49c5afcfd11243408430a71beb3cfb76

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Mathematica Policy Research Reports from Mathematica Policy Research Mathematica Policy Research P.O. Box 2393 Princeton, NJ 08543-2393 Attn: Communications. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joanne Pfleiderer () and Cindy George ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).