Using the Type of Bill to Classify Institutional Claims in 2017 (Brief)

Allison Barrett, Laura Nolan, Mary Allison Geibel, Kimberly Proctor and Jessie Parker

Mathematica Policy Research Reports from Mathematica Policy Research

Abstract: This analysis focused on 46 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, and Nebraska were excluded from the analysis.

Keywords: Medicaid data; TAF data quality; TAF DQ Brief; T-MSIS Analytic Files; TAF Research Identifiable Files (RIFs); type of bill; institutional claims (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 16
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.medicaid.gov/medicaid/data-and-systems ... abook-brief-5042.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mpr:mprres:6a9e336545ef4d2197e840dab78dcaab

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Mathematica Policy Research Reports from Mathematica Policy Research Mathematica Policy Research P.O. Box 2393 Princeton, NJ 08543-2393 Attn: Communications. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joanne Pfleiderer () and Cindy George ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).