Comparing Impact Findings from Design-Based and Model-Based Methods: An Empirical Investigation

Tim Kautz, Peter Z. Schochet and Charles Tilley

Mathematica Policy Research Reports from Mathematica Policy Research

Abstract: This study investigates how much of a practical difference it makes to use design-based methods versus more conventional model-based methods.

Keywords: randomized controlled trials; impact estimation; quantitative methods; causal inference; education interventions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 192
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mathematica.org/-/media/publications/p ... el-based-methods.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (https://www.mathematica.org/-/media/publications/pdfs/education/2017/design-model-based-methods.pdf [302 Found]--> https://www.mathematica.org/System/404-page-not-found?ItemNotFound=true)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mpr:mprres:b7656ddce20f4007b71836e99dd8bd87

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Mathematica Policy Research Reports from Mathematica Policy Research Mathematica Policy Research P.O. Box 2393 Princeton, NJ 08543-2393 Attn: Communications. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joanne Pfleiderer () and Cindy George ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).