The NQF Scientific Methods Panel: Enhancing the Review and Endorsement Process for Performance Measures

David R. Nerenz, David Cella, Lacy Fabian, Eugene Nuccio, John Bott, J. Matt Austin, Samuel Simon, Jack Needleman and Karen Johnson

Mathematica Policy Research Reports from Mathematica Policy Research

Abstract: In the summer of 2017, the National Quality Forum (NQF) announced the formation of a Scientific Methods Panel (hereafter referred to as “the Panel†) as part of a redesign of its endorsement process.

Keywords: National Quality Forum; quality measures; measure reliability; measure validity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1062860620914026 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mpr:mprres:c0fae6005c8645bbb802edcf02f7ceb4

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Mathematica Policy Research Reports from Mathematica Policy Research Mathematica Policy Research P.O. Box 2393 Princeton, NJ 08543-2393 Attn: Communications. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joanne Pfleiderer () and Cindy George ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).