Understanding transport project appraisal in its institutional dimension

Chiara Pancotti (), Matteo Pedralli (), Geert Smit () and Silvia Vignetti
Additional contact information
Chiara Pancotti: CSIL Centre for Industrial Studies, https://www.csilmilano.com/experts/Pancotti.html
Matteo Pedralli: CSIL Centre for Industrial Studies, https://www.csilmilano.com
Geert Smit: Ecorys, https://www.ecorys.com/

Working Papers from CSIL Centre for Industrial Studies

Abstract: Despite extensive convergence on the methodologies for transport project appraisal, the actual performance of transport infrastructures frequently differs from ex-ante forecasts. Among the possible reasons for this discrepancy, there are technical and institutional aspects. Technical reasons point to lacking data, failure to identify effects generated by the project, impossibility to include certain effects in the analysis. Institutional ones include strategic misrepresentations by project promoters, absence of incentives for the private and public sector to avoid optimism bias and reveal true information about the project, path dependency. This paper adopts a conceptual framework for the analysis of transport project appraisal systems, based on relevant literature and illustrated through good practices from different countries and international organisations. The framework’s illustration highlights how an appropriate institutional setting is instrumental for the proper use of transport project appraisal and its performance. The paper argues that embedding transport project appraisal in a formalised institutional setting is important to ensuring more transparency in public investment decision making and reducing uncertainties stemming from arbitrary or biased decision processes. Further, a robust institutional setting can increase the solidity and comparability of appraisal results, as well as ensure that these results feed into the decision-making process.

Keywords: Cost-Benefit analysis; project appraisal; transport project; decision-making process (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D61 G11 H43 O18 R42 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 32 pages
Date: 2020-07-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ppm and nep-tre
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.csilmilano.com/docs/WP2019_02.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mst:wpaper:201902

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from CSIL Centre for Industrial Studies Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Marinella Manghina ().