Interpersonal Comparisons of Well-Being

Charles Blackorby and Walter Bossert

Cahiers de recherche from Universite de Montreal, Departement de sciences economiques

Abstract: This paper, which is to be published as a chapter in the Oxford Handbook of Political Economy, provides an introduction to social-choice theory with interpersonal comparisons of well-being. We argue that the most promising route of escape from the negative conclusion of Arrow’s theorem is to use a richer informational environment than ordinal measurability and the absence of interpersonal comparability of well-being. We discuss welfarist social evaluation (which requires that the levels of individual well-being in two alternatives are the only determinants of their social ranking) and present characterizations of some important social-evaluation orderings.

Keywords: Arrow’s theorem; social choice with interrsonal utility comrisons; welfarism (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D63 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 17 pages
Date: 2004
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cdm, nep-evo, nep-hpe, nep-ltv and nep-mic
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/1866/520 (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Interpersonal comparisons of well-being (2004)
Working Paper: Interpersonal Comparisons of Well-Being (2004)
Working Paper: INTERPERSONAL COMPARISONS OF WELL-BEING (2004)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mtl:montde:2004-06

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Cahiers de recherche from Universite de Montreal, Departement de sciences economiques Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sharon BREWER ().