Three Degrees of Green Paradox: The Weak, The Strong, and the Extreme Green Paradox
Marc Gronwald,
Ngo Long and
Luise Roepke
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Luise Röpke
Cahiers de recherche from Centre interuniversitaire de recherche en économie quantitative, CIREQ
Abstract:
We show that a green paradox can be weak, or strong, or extreme. A weak green paradox arises when a green - intentioned policy measure worsens the quality of the environment at least in the near term. A strong green paradox outcome is obtained if the policy ends up causing greater cumulative environmental damages than under the business - as - usual scenario , though it may raise welfare , for example by adding productive green capacity. An extreme green paradox arises when aggregate welfare (net of environmental damages) falls as result of a poorly designed green - intentioned policy. We illustrate numerically the three degrees of green paradox using a model with a capacity - constrained green backstop technology in direct competition with fossil fuels.
Keywords: capacity constraints; green paradox; climate change; simultaneous resource use (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: H23 Q38 Q54 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 22 pages
Date: 2017
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ene, nep-env and nep-reg
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.cireqmontreal.com/wp-content/uploads/cahiers/02-2017-cah.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mtl:montec:02-2017
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Cahiers de recherche from Centre interuniversitaire de recherche en économie quantitative, CIREQ Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sharon BREWER ().