Researcher Incentives and Empirical Methods

Edward Glaeser

No 329, NBER Technical Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc

Abstract: Economists are quick to assume opportunistic behavior in almost every walk of life other than our own. Our empirical methods are based on assumptions of human behavior that would not pass muster in any of our models. The solution to this problem is not to expect a mass renunciation of data mining, selective data cleaning or opportunistic methodology selection, but rather to follow Leamer's lead in designing and using techniques that anticipate the behavior of optimizing researchers. In this essay, I make ten points about a more economic approach to empirical methods and suggest paths for methodological progress.

JEL-codes: A11 B4 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2006-10
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ecm, nep-hpe and nep-sog
Note: TWP
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (20)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nber.org/papers/t0329.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberte:0329

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.nber.org/papers/t0329

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in NBER Technical Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().