Methodenstreit 2011? Historical perspective on the contemporary debate over how to reform economics
Peter Spiegler () and
William Milberg ()
Additional contact information
William Milberg: Department of Economics, New School for Social Research
No 1106, Working Papers from New School for Social Research, Department of Economics
The general failure of economists to predict the financial crash of 2008 gave rise to a lively and apparently wide-ranging debate over the state of the discipline and the need (if any) for significant reform. But has the actual debate been robust enough to contemplate significant reform, or has it fallen short? We propose a framework for assessing the depth of methodological debate and apply it to the current methodological debate. Doing so, we find that the current debate has been shallow, especially when compared to historical precedents of deep debate such as the late 19th-century Methodenstreit and the period of Keynesian innovation. Moreover, we conclude that unless the few voices pressing for deep debate are given their due, there is little hope that the recent disciplinary crisis will be met with an appropriate level of reform.
Keywords: Financial crisis; methodology; ontology; history of economic thought; Keynes; Methodenstreit (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 41 pages
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.economicpolicyresearch.org/econ/2011/NSSR_WP_062011.pdf First version, 2011 (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:new:wpaper:1106
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from New School for Social Research, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Mark Setterfield ().