Economic Development, Structural Change and Women’s Labor Force Participation A Reexamination of the Feminization U Hypothesis

Isis Gaddis and Stephan Klasen

No 1302, Working Papers from New School for Social Research, Department of Economics

Abstract: A sizable literature claims that female labor force participation (FLFP) follows a U-shaped trend as countries develop due to structural change, education and fertility dynamics. We show that empirical support for this secular trend is feeble and depends on the data sources used, especially underlying GDP estimates. The U also tends to vanish under dynamic panel estimations. Moreover, cross-country differences in levels of FLFP related to historical contingencies are much more important than the muted U patterns found in some specifications. Given the large error margins in international GDP estimates and the sensitivity of the Urelationship we propose a more direct approach to explore the effect of structural change on FLFP using sector-specific growth rates. The results suggest that structural change affects FLFP consistent with a U-shaped pattern but the effects are small. We conclude that the feminization U hypothesis as an overarching secular trend driving FLFP in the development process has little empirical support.

Keywords: Female Labor Force Participation; Economic Development; Structural Change; Panel; GMM (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: J16 J21 J22 O11 O15 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 53 pages
Date: 2013-04
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-gro
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.economicpolicyresearch.org/econ/2013/NSSR_WP_022013.pdf First version, 2013 (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Economic development, structural change, and women’s labor force participation (2014)
Working Paper: Economic Development, Structural Change and Women’s Labor Force Participation A Reexamination of the Feminization U Hypothesis (2012)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:new:wpaper:1302

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from New School for Social Research, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Mark Setterfield (mark.setterfield@newschool.edu).