EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Invisible Deprivation and the Feminist Case for Joint Distributional Poverty Measures

Franziska Dorn (), Kirstin Munro () and Marie Vandenhirtz
Additional contact information
Franziska Dorn: Institute for Socio-Economics, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany
Kirstin Munro: Department of Economics, New School for Social Research, USA
Marie Vandenhirtz: Institute for Socioeconomics, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany

No 2612, Working Papers from New School for Social Research, Department of Economics

Abstract: Poverty measurement is often reduced to univariate thresholds or scalar indices linked to means. These one-dimensional types of thresholds may distort differences that are relevant to feminist economic inquiry, particularly for marginalized groups or where resource constraints reinforce one another. This article argues that the reduction of distortion is a central aim of feminist research methodology, and that joint distributional approaches offer a possible way forward. Unlike univariate poverty thresholds, joint distributional approaches ask which combinations of resources represent relative deprivation. We apply these techniques to the study of income and time poverty. Income and time are only partial substitutes, which conventional measures handle by imposing a fixed rate of substitution between time and money. Following Dorn et al. (2024), we instead define poverty as a contour of the joint empirical distribution of leisure and income, using the 2019 Panel Study of Income Dynamics. Roughly one in ten people is deprived in the joint allocation of both leisure and income while exceeding the lower bound of both univariate thresholds, a group we call the Invisibly Deprived. Women make up a disproportionate share of this group, with classification highly sensitive to assumptions about intra-household income sharing.

Keywords: Feminist statistics; multidimensional poverty measurement; time and income poverty; statistics beyond the mean; intersectional inequality (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 36 pages
Date: 2026-10
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://repec.economicpolicyresearch.org/econ/2026/NSSR_WP_122026.pdf First version, 2026 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:new:wpaper:2612

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from New School for Social Research, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Mark Setterfield ().

 
Page updated 2026-10-19
Handle: RePEc:new:wpaper:2612