On the Consistency of Slacks-based Measure-Max Model and Super-Slacks-based Measure Model

Kaoru Tone ()
Additional contact information
Kaoru Tone: National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies

No 16-24, GRIPS Discussion Papers from National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies

Abstract: Slacks-based measure (SBM) (Tone (2001), Pastor et al. (1999)) has been widely utilized as a representative non-radial DEA model. However, this model, called SBM-Min here, evaluates the efficiency of an inefficient DMU referring to the furthest frontier point within a range. In contrast, the SBM-Max model looks for the nearest frontier point and hence its score is generally greater than the SBM-Min score. The Super-SBM model (Tone (2002)) evaluates the efficiency of an efficient DMU referring to the nearest point on the frontier except itself. We can foresee a close connection between SBM-Max and Super-SBM models, because the motivations behind the two models are same. In this paper we demonstrate this consistency using a real dataset.

Pages: 10 pages
Date: 2016-11
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://grips.repo.nii.ac.jp/?action=repository_ac ... bute_id=20&file_no=1 (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 403 Forbidden (https://grips.repo.nii.ac.jp/?action=repository_action_common_download&item_id=1536&item_no=1&attribute_id=20&file_no=1 [302 Moved Temporarily]--> https://grips.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/1536/files/DP16-24.pdf [302 FOUND]--> https://nrjjxl1nnwb4.compat.objectstorage.ap-tokyo-1.oraclecloud.com/contents/grips_repo_nii_ac_jp/03/e0/af3b-7efe-4899-9cb4-2f904ce1e831/data?response-content-type=application%2Foctet-stream&response-content-disposition=attachment%3B%20filename%3DDP16-24.pdf&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=2933d73c5ea35b566afd770d1a6af5c853196a77%2F20260912%2Fap-tokyo-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20260912T135656Z&X-Amz-Expires=60&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Signature=4d8d5c4f1d1ca8b0c565c74272b806a189654e87c3ecc16ce972b82f65b21c16)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ngi:dpaper:16-24

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in GRIPS Discussion Papers from National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).