Bilateral Comparisons and Consistent Fair Division Rules in the Context of Bankruptcy Problems

Nir Dagan () and Oscar Volij ()

Economic theory and game theory from Nir Dagan

Abstract: We analyze the problem of extending a given bilateral principle of justice to a consistent n-creditor bankruptcy rule. Based on the bilateral principle, we build a family of binary relations on the set of creditors in order to make bilateral comparisons between them. We find that the possibility of extending a specific bilateral principle of justice in a consistent way is closely related to the quasi-transitivity of the binary relations mentioned above.

Pages: 15 pages
Date: 1997
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (27)

Published in International Journal of Game Theory 26:11-25 (1997)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nirdagan.com/research/199701/full.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Bilateral Comparisons and Consistent Fair Division Rules in the Context of Bankruptcy Problems (1997)
Working Paper: Bilateral Comparisons and Consistent Fair Division Rules in the Context of Bankruptcy Problems (1997)
Working Paper: Bilateral Comparisons and Consistent Fair Division Rules in the Context of Bankruptcy Problems (1994)
Working Paper: Bilateral Comparisons and Consistent Fair Division Rules in the Context of Bankruptcy Problems (1994)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nid:ndagan:004

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Economic theory and game theory from Nir Dagan Nir Dagan, Dept. of Economics and Management, Tel-Hai Academic College, Upper Galilee, Israel..
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Nir Dagan ().