A Remark on Bargaining and Non-Expected Utility

Oscar Volij ()

Economic theory and game theory from Oscar Volij

Abstract: We show that a bargaining game of alternating offers with exogenous risk of breakdown and played by dynamically consistent non-expected utility maximizers is formally equivalent to Rubinstein's (1982) game with time preference. Within this game, the behavior of dynamically consistent players is indistinguishable from the behavior of expected utility maximizers.

Keywords: Bargaining; non-expected utility. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C70 C72 C78 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2002-01-23
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-mic
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Published in Mathematical Social Sciences, 44(1), 1-15, September 2002.

Downloads: (external link)
http://volij.co.il/publications/papers/altern.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: A remark on bargaining and non-expected utility (2002)
Working Paper: A Remark on Bargaining and Non-Expected Utility (2002)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nid:ovolij:016

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://volij.co.il/addr.html

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Economic theory and game theory from Oscar Volij Oscar Volij, Department of Economics, Ben-Gurion University, Beer-Sheva 84105, Israel.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oscar Volij ().