Tests for the Null Hypothesis of Cointegration: a Monte Carlo Comparison
Vasco Gabriel
No 7/2001, NIPE Working Papers from NIPE - Universidade do Minho
Abstract:
The aim of this paper is to compare the relative performance of several tests for the null hypothesis of cointegration, in terms of size and power in finite samples. This is carried out resorting to Monte Carlo simulations, considering a range of plausible data-generating processes. As of this writing, there is no study providing guidance on the use of this type of procedures in empirical situations, with the exception of the limited studies of McCabe et al. (1997) and Haug (1996). We also analyse the impact on size and power of choosing different procedures to estimate the long-run variance of the errors. we found that the parametrically adjusted test of McCabe et al. (1997) is the most well-balanced test in terms of power and size distrortions.
Keywords: Cointegration; Tests; Monte Carlo. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C12 C22 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2001
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www3.eeg.uminho.pt/economia/nipe/docs/2001/NIPE_WP_7_2001.PDF (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: Tests for the Null Hypothesis of Cointegration: A Monte Carlo Comparison (2003) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nip:nipewp:7/2001
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in NIPE Working Papers from NIPE - Universidade do Minho Núcleo de Investigação em Políticas Económicas e Empresariais, Escola de Economia e Gestão, Universidade do Minho, P-4710-057 Braga, Portugal. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by NIPE ().