Examining the Robustness of Competing Explanations of Slow Growth in African Countries

Ronelle Burger () and Stan Du Plessis ()

Discussion Papers from University of Nottingham, CREDIT

Abstract: This research challenges previous findings regarding the robustness of the African growth dummy by expanding the list of variables to include those suggested by Easterly and Levine (1998) and Sachs and Warner (1997b). Using the Bayesian Averaging of Classical Estimates approach, this paper concludes that the African growth dummy does not appear to be robustly related to growth. This supports the interpretation that the presence of the African dummy in other studies results from misspecification. The paper also contributes to the debate on growth strategies for Africa by assessing the robustness of divergent perspectives offered in the recent literature.

Keywords: growth; Africa; model specification; robustness (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2006-02
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/credit/documents/papers/06-02.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Examining the Robustness of Competing Explanations of Slow Growth in African Countries (2011)
Working Paper: Examining the Robustness of Competing Explanations of Slow Growth in African Countries (2006)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:not:notcre:06/02

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Discussion Papers from University of Nottingham, CREDIT School of Economics University of Nottingham University Park Nottingham NG7 2RD. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Hilary Hughes ().