WHY USE ROSCAS WHEN YOU CAN USE BANKS? THEORY AND EVIDENCE FROM ETHIOPIA

Abbi Kedir, Richard Disney and Indraneel Dasgupta ()

Discussion Papers from University of Nottingham, CREDIT

Abstract: Much of the existing literature on the use of informal credit arrangements such as ROSCAs (Rotating and Credit Saving Associations) theorises the use of such institutions as arising from market failures in the development of formal saving and credit mechanisms. As economic development proceeds, formal institutions might therefore be expected to displace ROSCAs. We show, using household data for Ethiopia, that in fact use of formal institutions and ROSCAs can co-exist, even in the same household. We examine usage of both formal and informal institutions across the household income gradient, and provide a theoretical model consistent with these empirical facts.

Keywords: Household saving; Credit institutions; ROSCAs; Ethiopia (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011-05
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/credit/documents/papers/11-05.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Why Use ROSCAs When You Can Use Banks? Theory and Evidence from Ethiopia (2011)
Working Paper: Why use ROSCAs when you can use banks? Theory, and evidence from Ethiopia (2011)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:not:notcre:11/05

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Discussion Papers from University of Nottingham, CREDIT School of Economics University of Nottingham University Park Nottingham NG7 2RD. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Hilary Hughes ().