A note on firm-productivity and foreign direct investment

Arijit Mukherjee

Discussion Papers from University of Nottingham, School of Economics

Abstract: Assuming linear demand and unit transportation cost, Head and Ries (2003, ‘Heterogeneity and the FDI versus export decision of Japanese manufacturers’, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies) conclude that the theoretical prediction of Helpman et al. (2004, ‘Export versus FDI with heterogeneous firms’, The American Economic Review), which show that the more productive firms undertake FDI and the less productive firms export, does not depend on their assumptions of CES preferences and iceberg transportation costs. Considering iceberg transportation costs in an otherwise similar setup of Head and Ries (2003), we show that the theoretical prediction of Helpman et al. (2004) may not hold. Hence, CES preference in Helpman et al. (2004) is important for their theoretical results.

Keywords: Firm-productivity; Foreign direct investment; Iceberg cost (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010-02
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/economics/documents/discussion-papers/10-02.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: A note on firm-productivity and foreign direct investment (2010)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:not:notecp:10/02

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Discussion Papers from University of Nottingham, School of Economics School of Economics University of Nottingham University Park Nottingham NG7 2RD. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().