History and Civil Conflict

Michael Bleaney and Arcangelo Dimico

Discussion Papers from University of Nottingham, School of Economics

Abstract: How much does the antiquity of states, and the sometimes arbitrary nature of colonial boundaries, explain why some states are more susceptible to civil conflict than others? Older states and those with greater historical legitimacy (more continuity between the pre-colonial and post-colonial state) have less ethnic diversity. Controlling for a lack of historical legitimacy, ethnic polarization adds to the risk of conflict, but a short history of statehood does not. The degree of political organization of ethnic groups or their exclusion from political power does not significantly affect the risk of conflict.

Date: 2012-02
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/economics/documents/discussion-papers/12-02.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:not:notecp:12/02

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Discussion Papers from University of Nottingham, School of Economics School of Economics University of Nottingham University Park Nottingham NG7 2RD. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().