EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Do Spillovers Matter When Estimating Private Returns to R&D?

Markus Eberhardt, Christian Helmers () and Hubert Strauss

Discussion Papers from University of Nottingham, GEP

Abstract: A large body of literature estimates private returns to R&D adopting the Griliches knowledge production framework which ignores the potential impact of spillovers on consistent estimation. Using a panel of 12 manufacturing industries across ten OECD economies, we investigate whether ignoring spillovers leads to bias in the estimated private returns to R&D. We compare results from a common factor framework, which accounts for spillovers and other unobserved shocks, to those from a standard Griliches approach. Our findings confirm that conventional estimates conflate own-R&D and spillover effects, implying that spillovers cannot be ignored even when the interest lies exclusively in evaluating private returns to R&D.

Keywords: Productivity; R&D; Spillovers; Common Factor Model (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (19)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/gep/documents/papers/2011/11-22.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Do Spillovers Matter When Estimating Private Returns to R&D? (2013) Downloads
Working Paper: Do spillovers matter when estimating private returns to R&D? (2010) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:not:notgep:11/22

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Discussion Papers from University of Nottingham, GEP School of Economics University of Nottingham University Park Nottingham NG7 2RD. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Hilary Hughes ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-31
Handle: RePEc:not:notgep:11/22