Is it really worse with a Bird in Hand? A comparison of fiscal rules for resource-rich economies

Roberto Iacono ()

Working Paper Series from Department of Economics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology

Abstract: This paper produces a normative evaluation of fiscal rules for a resource- rich small open economy. Ad-hoc fiscal rules might be sub-optimal and imply substantial welfare costs: the target is to analyze the magnitude of the costs by evaluating the relative welfare sub-optimality of these rules. I posit a closed-form solution for the infinite horizon maximization problem of the social planner of a small open economy with resource price uncertainty and precautionary saving. The model is subsequently calibrated to provide a welfare-based comparison between the fiscal rule based on the Permanent Income Hypothesis and the ad-hoc Bird in Hand rule. The result of the calibration indicates the presence of a positive absolute welfare gap and of an approximately null relative wealth loss from employing the Bird in Hand rule. This result is shown to be robust under different parameterizations. No, it is not that much worse with a Bird in Hand policy.

Pages: 22 pages
Date: 2012-03-02
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.svt.ntnu.no/iso/WP/2012/3_Ultima%20bozza.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: A comparison of fiscal rules for resource-rich economies (2017)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nst:samfok:12612

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Paper Series from Department of Economics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Anne Larsen ().