Scheme New Zealand or An Example of The Operation of Div 165

Justice Graham Hill

Taxation from ATAX, University of New South Wales

Abstract: There is no decided case in Australia yet regarding the application of general anti-avoidance rules to a transaction with respect to GST. However, this has been considered to some extent in a recent case in New Zealand, TRA No 001/02 v Commissioner of Inland Revenue. This paper considers the decision made by the New Zealand Taxation Review Authority on that case as a vehicle for speculating on the outcome under the general anti-avoidance rules contained in the Australian GST Act, had a scheme equivalent to the New Zealand scheme been implemented in Australia.

Keywords: anti-avoidance; New Zealand; Australia (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 14 pages
Date: 2003-12-10
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.atax.unsw.edu.au/ejtr.html
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (http://www.atax.unsw.edu.au/ejtr.html [302 Moved Temporarily]--> https://www.atax.unsw.edu.au:443/ejtr.html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nsw:discus:63

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.atax.unsw.edu.au/research

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Taxation from ATAX, University of New South Wales Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Research Assistant ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).