 The impact of New Zealand’s macroeconomic frameworks on living standardsMelissa van Rensburg ()
Treasury Analytical Notes Series from New Zealand Treasury Abstract: A stable macroeconomic environment improves certainty for households and businesses, supporting them in making economic choices that will improve their wellbeing. Macroeconomic stability can also improve the socio-economic outcomes for those at the lower end of the income or wealth distribution since they are less able to smooth their incomes when there are shocks. Macroeconomic stabilisation frameworks are therefore crucial to supporting living standards. New Zealand’s fiscal framework is underpinned by principles of responsible fiscal management and transparency. Since they were introduced, fiscal sustainability indicators have improved. Fiscal policy has also become more counter-cyclical since the early 2000s and helped to support incomes and labour market attachment during the pandemic. However, a question that needs to be addressed is whether a focus on fiscal prudence has come at the expense of under-investment in infrastructure. More research is required in order to adequately answer this question. Some ways in which fiscal policy has affected inequality are explored, but a comprehensive assessment is outside the scope of this note and remains an area for future research. New Zealand’s monetary policy framework has two main objectives, price stability and maximum sustainable employment. Price signals are integral to the allocation of goods and services in modern economies. Inflation can make it harder to discern these price signals, leading consumers and producers to misallocate scarce resources. The employment objective, which was formalised in 2018 with the introduction of a dual mandate, reflects the view that labour market outcomes should also be considered by the central bank in pursuing its price stability objective. Since the current monetary policy framework was introduced in 1989, the rate and volatility of inflation as well as output volatility have declined. The consensus in the international literature is that monetary policy frameworks have succeeded in lowering and anchoring inflation expectations. Inflation in New Zealand has averaged close to the 2% mid-point target over the 2002-2020 period and has more often than not been within the target range. Macroprudential policy is aimed at reducing risks facing the financial system. The financial system is integral to society’s ability to exchange goods and services, and to save and invest. Moderating the risk of financial disruptions is intended to preserve this capability through time. As discussed in the body of this paper, there is research that shows that the use of loan-to-value ratio restrictions has been successful at improving New Zealand’s financial stability. Monetary policy and macroprudential policy can also affect inequality through various channels, but there is no consensus in the literature yet on their net impact. Further research is required to understand the effectiveness and possible side-effects of the fiscal and monetary policy response to the pandemic, including the effect on asset prices and distributional outcomes. JEL-codes: E52 E61 E62 E63 (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nzt:nztans:an22/02 Access Statistics for this paper More papers in Treasury Analytical Notes Series from New Zealand Treasury New Zealand Treasury, PO Box 3724, Wellington 6140, New Zealand. Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.