Lessons from Investment Policy Reform in Korea

Françoise Nicolas, Stephen Thomsen and Mi-Hyun Bang
Additional contact information
Françoise Nicolas: Institut Français des relations internationales
Stephen Thomsen: OECD
Mi-Hyun Bang: OECD

No 2013/2, OECD Working Papers on International Investment from OECD Publishing

Abstract: As more and more countries seek to liberalise their foreign investment regimes to attract global flows of foreign direct investment (FDI), an essential question for policy-makers is no longer just what to reform but also how to reform. How is a reformist government to sell the idea of reform to the general public and to counter any opposition to reform? How are those who lose from reform in the short term to be compensated? Does sequencing of reforms matter? Korea offers a particularly interesting case study because its reforms beginning in the 1990s were both rapid and far-reaching. Based on the OECD FDI Regulatory Restrictiveness Index, Korea was the biggest reformer of its policies towards FDI between 1997 and 2010 among a sample of 40 developed and emerging countries. The objective of this study is to document the liberalisation of the FDI regime in Korea and to examine how and why it came about. What were the main obstacles and what were the main drivers? How did FDI liberalisation relate to other reforms (trade policy and regulatory reform, policies towards outward investment)? The paper does not ask what more Korea needs to do but rather what lessons can we draw from the Korean experience about how to achieve rapid and sustainable reforms? The insights from Korean liberalisation are useful for other countries, particularly non-OECD members in Asia and elsewhere, which still have high levels of statutory restrictions as measured by the FDI Index. Many of these countries are eager to attract more investment and recognise that they will need to reform their investment regime but are unsure how best to proceed. Each country?s reform path is unique, and this study will not provide a roadmap for other countries to follow, but it will nevertheless serve as a useful model for reformers in other countries and provide evidence that successful reform is accompanied by rising inflows of direct investment.

Keywords: FDI Regulatory Restrictiveness Index; foreign direct investment; investment policy reform; segyehwa; South Korea (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F21 F23 F53 O24 O53 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013-07-30
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-sea
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1787/5k4376zqcpf1-en (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oec:dafaaa:2013/2-en

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in OECD Working Papers on International Investment from OECD Publishing Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().