Generative AI experimentation in government: Learning from emerging guidelines

Oecd

No 93, OECD Working Papers on Public Governance from OECD Publishing

Abstract: Public servants are increasingly adopting generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), often without formal oversight. This paper addresses the widening gap between rapid, decentralised GenAI uptake and lagging public governance mechanisms. It focuses on structured experimentation as a critical pathway for governments to build capabilities, manage risks, and ensure responsible technology adoption before full-scale deployment. Drawing on a systematic review of official guidelines across 14 countries, academic literature, and case studies, the paper examines how jurisdictions translate high-level ethical principles into operational practice. The findings reveal that, while guidelines are widespread, they remain highly fragmented and uneven, leading to risk aversion or inconsistent practices. Furthermore, monitoring and evaluation are identified as critical weaknesses, with few governments systematically measuring performance, impact, or compliance. To bridge the gap between national strategies and daily public administration, the paper presents an evaluation framework across five core areas: performance, public value, feasibility, usability, and risk management.

Keywords: AI experimentation; GenAI; Generative AI (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026-07-20
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1787/42815683-en (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oec:govaaa:93-en

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in OECD Working Papers on Public Governance from OECD Publishing Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().