Regulatory policy 2.0: Viewpoints and beliefs about better regulation: A report from the “Q exercise”

Claudio M. Radaelli, Lorenzo Allio, Karl O’Connor, Richard Alcorn and Daniel Trnka
Additional contact information
Claudio M. Radaelli: European University Institute
Lorenzo Allio: allio-rodrigo consulting
Karl O’Connor: Ulster University
Richard Alcorn: OECD
Daniel Trnka: OECD

No 20, OECD Regulatory Policy Working Papers from OECD Publishing

Abstract: Regulatory policy today is still grounded in principles and tools designed a few decades ago, but the context has changed significantly. To determine whether the current framework can help countries meet the challenges of contemporary societies, the OECD launched the Regulatory Policy 2.0 project. This report sets out the results from the second phase of the project, which included an exercise to map beliefs around better regulation. The exercise, involving government officials and regulatory experts, has identified four internally coherent belief systems about what better regulation is today, which core aims it should have, and where it should go in the future. Based on this analysis, the report provides empirical evidence and implications for the future direction of regulatory policy.

Keywords: Better Regulation; Regulatory Policy 2.0 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A1 D6 D7 H00 Z18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022-10-04
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-reg
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1787/ab640ae8-en (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oec:govaah:20-en

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in OECD Regulatory Policy Working Papers from OECD Publishing Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).