Efficiency and Equity Implications of Alternative Instruments to Reduce Carbon Leakage

Christoph Böhringer, Jared Carbone and Thomas F. Rutherford ()
Additional contact information
Thomas F. Rutherford: University of Wisconsin, USA

No V-346-12, Working Papers from University of Oldenburg, Department of Economics

Abstract: The cost-effectiveness of unilateral emission abatement can be seriously hampered by emission leakage. We assess three widely-discussed proposals for leakage reduction targeted at energy-intensive and trade-exposed industries: border tax adjustments, output-based allocation and industry exemptions. We find that none of these measures amounts to a “magic bullet” when both efficiency and equity criteria matter. Border tax adjustments reduce leakage and provide global cost savings but exacerbate regional inequality. Exemptions produce very little leakage reduction and run the risk of increasing efficiency cost of climate policy. Output-based allocation does no harm but also does relatively little good by our outcome measures.

Keywords: Unilateral Climate Policy; Leakage; Efficiency; Equity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 23 pages
Date: 2012-06, Revised 2012-06
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ene, nep-env and nep-res
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (47)

Published in Oldenburg Working Papers V-346-12

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.vwl.uni-oldenburg.de/download/V-346-12.pdf First version, 2012 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:old:dpaper:346

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from University of Oldenburg, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catharina Schramm ().